How long is environmental damage tolerated? | ¿Hasta cuándo se tolera el daño al medioambiente?

Editorial, El Deber:

It is not just one threatened area, nor two nor three. The environment is under threat across the country and in multiple ways. And involved, there are insensitive authorities, who have not been able to prevent damage to the ecosystem, who grant licenses of all kinds and who are responsible for water pollution, loss of forests and animals, among other effects whose damages will be seen in short time.

Only in Santa Cruz there are at least three known facts in the last week. The most noisy has to do with the Las Cruces-Buena Vista highway and the intervention in the Güenda-Urubó protected area. The route proposed by the national government intends to split this aquifer recharge area in two, leaving a devastating effect on the provision of water to the department’s metropolitan area. This reality collides head-on with the stubbornness of the Minister of Public Works and, therefore, of those who manage the Bolivian Highway Administrator.

As if that were not enough, it turns out that on the same protected area there are more than 17,000 lots that are offered for sale for $1,000 to public employees from all over the country, as if the provision of water for this and the following generations were a minor issue. The implantation of urbanizations in the area would generate sewage that would contaminate the underground aquifers in an irremediable way.

In another area of the department, the opening of a road was authorized, splitting the forest of giant ferns in two, an area that was unique and considered a jewel of nature, now an environmental disaster. Of course, not only whoever did it is responsible, but also whoever authorized it.

On the other hand, there are various so-called protected areas, but in reality they are left on their own, which have become fertile ground for illegal coca plantations and for the installation of cocaine factories. They are not intervened and they also have armed surveillance.

The exploitation of gold is another of the serious crimes against nature. There is an excessive and discretionary use of mercury that fills the rivers from which various indigenous communities get their water with toxins. But there is also an invasion of huge dredges that alter the ground. The consequence of all this is the periodic landslides in the northern area of La Paz. Are there forceful actions by the State to stop it? Very few, the majority for the show and many speeches that hide indolence or permissiveness.

The dams that provide water to La Paz are surrounded by sewage that can generate contamination and on which there is no clear intervention on the part of the authorities.

Every time the president or his ministers leave the country they give “exemplary” speeches about how Bolivia takes care of “Pachamama” or Mother Earth, but in truth there is disinterest and indolence about what really happens with natural resources. It is a logic of getting the maximum profit today, regardless of the cost for tomorrow. An unfortunate reality that the youngest and children will pay.

Already at this time there are cities hit by periodic droughts, there are polluted lagoons and large lakes that are drying up. Will the president and his ministers or mayors care that in five or ten years their children and grandchildren have to suffer from high temperatures, lack of water and a host of other problems?

The claim must come from the citizenry. Those who have the mission of taking care of us are failing in the attempt.

Leave a comment