Pagina Siete reports:

THEY INDICATE THAT GREATER INSECURITY CAUSES

Anapo notes the new law against land takeovers

The producers claim that the norm also affect owners of foreign origin.

The Producers Association of Oleaginous and Wheat (Anapo) questioned some of the articles of the law against the subjugation and land traffic and considered that it generates greater legal uncertainty to the productive land in the country.

The President of Anapo, Demetrio Pérez, pointed out that that law does not include tougher sanctions. He argued, in addition, that it becomes overbearing to the current legal holders of foreign origin, who have the right to work and produce long ago, before the promulgation of the INRA law of 1996, according to a statement from the institution.

Producers who are working the land in more than 5,000 hectares can also run the same fate.

He regretted that it did not want to admit as evidence of the Commission of the subjugation, the INRA field reports, satellite images and photographs showing the recent settlement of the invaders on private grounds.

An study was asked to be made, of all human settlement in forest reserves to quantify the human damage and production if the invaders are not removed.

They only thought of Guarayos and there are medium and large producers who now will be the first affected by the application of this law, indicates the institutional release.

It also expresses that “as well as the project is, it provides a retrospective application of the political Constitution of the State, which makes its second additional provision unconstitutional because it violates basic rights to work, life, property and violates international treaties”.

“We very much regret that are legislators from the West, and Eugenio Rojas or Julio Salazar, who, forgetting the success of their own agricultural peasants in Santa Cruz, have directed the course of this law to insecurity to the entire productive sector”, he said.

Anapo also said he refuses to believe that the departure of some people related to the march [protest]  in Santa Cruz have so decisively influenced the legislators who approved the rule.

The new norm

Approval. In the Chamber of Deputies, has passed the law against the enslavement and trafficking of land and was sent to the Executive for promulgation. By incorporating the criminal code figure or type of land traffic, those who incurred in the invasion of a land or private property will receive a sentence of up to eight years of imprisonment or jail.

Scope.  The standard aims to provide the status of instruments necessary to preserve, protect and defend the privately owned by individual, collective and public land.

http://www.paginasiete.bo/economia/2013/12/25/anapo-observa-nueva-contra-avasallamientos-9503.html