The international community and democracy in Bolivia | La comunidad internacional y la democracia en Bolivia

By Andres Gomez, Vision 360:

The European Economic Community, the Latin American community, and the democratic countries of the world should take seriously the signals from the Arce government.

President Luis Arce greeted, in a statement from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on March 30, the antidemocratic actions of Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro. It wasn’t just a casual greeting. It’s a greeting that should concern the international community, particularly for the practices it announces and the consequences it conceals.

Maduro disqualified opposition candidate María Corina Machado simply because she had serious chances of winning the elections on July 28. To make matters worse, he also banned her replacement: Corina Yoris, an 80-year-old academic with an impeccable record. When Yoris was going to register her candidacy and surely would have succeeded, the Venezuelan dictatorship blocked the website and military personnel denied access to the National Electoral Council (CNE) building.

This latest antidemocratic action broke the Barbados agreement, where the dictator committed to transparent elections. The CNE, controlled by Maduro, only registered candidates who pose no risk to the perpetuation of Chavism in power. Seeing that he had gone too far, the allies of the Venezuelan tyrant, including Presidents Lula (Brazil) and Petro (Colombia), and former President Mujica (Uruguay), condemned him and demanded free elections. In contrast, Luis Arce supported him.

The European Economic Community, the Latin American community, and the democratic countries of the world should take seriously the signals from the Arce government. Do they want Bolivia to become another Venezuela, another Cuba, or another Nicaragua? If they do not speak out now with firmness, within the framework of international norms of coexistence, it may be too late in a year, as late as detecting a cancer that is already in its terminal phase.

At this point, the international community knows that the killers of democracy are authoritarian politicians who come to power through the rules of democracy. Mussolini and Hitler seized power because some people within the political system opened the doors of the system for them to enter and destroy it. Mussolini was welcomed by King Victor Emmanuel III. Hitler was supported by Reich President Paul von Hindenburg.

Something similar happened with Hugo Chávez. Venezuelan President Rafael Caldera welcomed him. Mussolini, Hitler, and Chávez used democratic institutions to kill democracy. Then, they closed the door to any other politician.

Bolivia followed a similar path. Evo Morales and Álvaro García had failed in their attempt to destroy democracy from outside the system. So, they pretended to accept the rules of the system to take power. Legitimate political and social actors rolled out the red carpet for them, believing they would become democratic politicians. Impossible. As soon as they achieved their goal, they began to dismantle it.

As evidence, I point out some actions: they broke the constitutional limit that establishes only one reelection, mocked a referendum, committed fraud, concentrated all power in one person, persecuted free thinkers, violated human rights and killed, silenced independent journalism, fostered violent groups, destroyed NGOs, and polarized civil society.

After a popular mobilization ousted the illegitimate rulers in November 2019, the MAS leadership once again pretended to play by the rules of democracy. In that sense, they agreed with the opposition, under the mediation of the European Union and the Catholic Church, for Jeanine Áñez to assume the presidency. As soon as they had the opportunity, they broke the agreement like Maduro; created a power vacuum and sent their followers to die (Sacaba and Senkata) to call the restoration of democracy a “coup.”

Áñez appointed an honest person to the Supreme Electoral Tribunal, but her mismanagement and the pandemic contributed to the MAS’s return to power in October 2020.

As expected, Luis Arce and David Choquehuanca continued the dismantling of democracy. They jailed, fabricated trials, and sentenced people who contributed to the recovery of democracy, but left the main perpetrator of the Sacaba and Senkata massacres of 2019 unpunished. Minister of Justice Iván Lima blamed Morales for those deaths for “insisting on going against a referendum,” but did not prosecute him as he should have.

The Arce government jailed innocent coca growers and engineered the self-extension of magistrates in exchange for favorable judgments for their political objectives. The head of their party himself accused Arce’s government of using magistrates of the Constitutional Court to disqualify him. That is, what Maduro did to María Corina Machado, the Arce-Choquehuanca regime has already done to him. Who will be next? I suppose Morales now believes in the importance of having independent magistrates and judges.

Recently, Arce illegally dismissed a member of the TSE, Dina Chuquimia, whom he had also illegally appointed. He placed in that position a figure even more questionable than her predecessor for her antidemocratic practices. As if that weren’t enough, Choquehuanca exudes, like Hitler, speeches of hatred and Aymara supremacy.

Moreover, the international community, particularly the European Union, should pay close attention to the antidemocratic signals from the MAS government. Arce is an ally of Putin, Ortega, Maduro, and Díaz-Canel. I’m not asking for economic sanctions, but at least to avoid financing the antidemocratic practices of the regime that controls the judiciary and the TSE. A democratic government does not control other branches; it guarantees free elections.

If Arce is going to reproduce in power pretending to be a democrat, Bolivia may suffer the fate of Venezuela, Nicaragua, and Cuba, and thousands of Bolivians will be forced to migrate. Where to? To neighboring countries, to Europe, to the USA. That’s why it’s important for the international community to pay close attention to Arce’s antidemocratic signals.

Leave a comment