The Police Reform Bolivia Needs | El cambio policial que Bolivia necesita

Editorial, El Pais:

Without an honest police force, no State can function and no citizen can trust it.

The Bolivian Police has dragged for decades a problem that corrodes its very foundations: corruption. This is not just about a few “bad officers,” as is often claimed to minimize the issue. It is about a system where bribes, the buying and selling of assignments, the covering up of crimes, and the private use of public resources are part of everyday operations. The lack of effective oversight has normalized practices that erode public trust. Without a reliable police force, any effort to strengthen the rule of law is doomed to fragility, because the very institution tasked with ensuring security turns into a source of insecurity and abuse.

Overcoming this reality requires a comprehensive plan, sustained over time and shielded from the temptations of political power. First, police recruitment and training must undergo deep reforms. Admission can no longer depend on contacts, family names, or financial contributions. Merit, transparency, and vocation for service must guide police entry and career development. At the same time, it is essential to implement periodic performance evaluations, with participation from external bodies that guarantee objectivity.

Corruption in the Bolivian Police cannot be solved through isolated punishments, but through structural reforms that strengthen meritocracy, transparency, and citizen oversight. Second, the institution’s funding structure must be rethought. It is unsustainable that its daily operations depend on informal contributions from citizens, on “arrangements” with drivers or shopkeepers, or on fees disguised as administrative procedures. To break this vicious cycle, police salaries must be decent, in line with the responsibility of the position, and material resources must be guaranteed transparently by the State, so there is no excuse to seek “parallel financing.”

The third step involves a robust system of internal and external oversight. The Inspectorate, currently more concerned with protecting hierarchies and punishing subordinates than investigating higher ranks, must be replaced—or at least supervised—by independent bodies, with active participation from civil society and human rights organizations. The Public Prosecutor’s Office, in turn, must take on a firmer role, ensuring that investigations do not end with minor penalties or cases that expire. Police corruption is structural and must therefore be investigated as a network: chains of command, financial circuits, political ties, and economic benefits that sustain the system.

Technology can play a decisive role. The use of body cameras during operations, digital traceability systems for fines and seizures, biometric attendance controls, and a public registry of patrols could reduce discretion, strengthen accountability, and give citizens tools to demand transparency. Without these instruments, reformist speeches will remain mere good intentions.

Ending police corruption is not the task of a single government or an isolated administration. It is a State commitment that requires political will, inter-institutional coordination, and social support. The challenge is immense: dismantling practices entrenched for generations and perpetuated because they are profitable for those who administer them. But Bolivia cannot renounce this goal. A police force at the service of citizens—and not its own interests—is an indispensable condition for building a fairer and safer country. Without addressing this problem at its root, the promise of justice and security will remain nothing more than a chimera.

Leave a comment