Incredulity, Fear, Indifference | Incredulidad, miedo, indiferencia

By Renzo Abruzzese, Brújula Digital:

The palpable social anxiety over the shortage of dollars contrasts sharply with the government’s discourse that boasts of economic stability and a glorious future. Its main component, the dollar, has become less a means of exchange and more a fetish. It is a painful symbol of the lost normalcy, one that is beginning to reveal the true reasons that brought us to this point.

When the crisis began, we saw it as a harbinger of the economic difficulties looming ahead; despite this, we held on to the hope that the situation would be brought under control. Later, it became the real measure of our wages, and we began to notice—much sooner than expected—that our monthly income no longer covered our expenses. Eventually, we realized it was our only survival tool. By then, there was no longer any doubt about what we were going through: it was called a crisis, and it had a surname—its surname was MAS.

Liberals tell us it is a reflection of the precariousness of the plurinational model that MAS supporters are so proud of. The fanatic economists of the “Popular Bloc” claim the crisis is the result of maneuvers by an unpatriotic “right-wing” allied with imperialism. We, in the deepest part of our conscience, believe it is the outcome of a powerful dose of incredulity, a considerable amount of fear, and an almost complicit indifference that ended up catching up with us. The crisis is, in addition to the MAS regime’s ineptitude, the consequence of the Bolivian people’s naïve honesty.

The first condition, Incredulity, led a large portion of Bolivians to believe that the authoritarian regime ruling amid a sea of abuses was the key we had been seeking since the founding of the republic, and that the first indigenous man in the Government Palace embodied the definitive solution to our historical sufferings. However, we soon began to wonder whether we really deserved such a government. The second condition, fear, took hold without pretense to the point that it seemed natural. We became used to a unipolar way of thinking and to the rule of self-imposed silence. It became forbidden to think differently under threat of being labeled a right-wing traitor, a ruthless q’ara, or a raving madman dangerously hostile to the Process of Change. Finally, the third condition, indifference, born from a deceptive sense of well-being fostered by the boom in exported commodity prices, resembled more the stupor of a dying person, who in their languor had the power to paralyze protest, suspend critical reasoning, and gag divergent voices under the sacred veil of a racist, triumphant, and hegemonic indigenous identity.

The crisis has revealed the perverse nature of the Process of Change and clearly exposed its resounding failure. It has laid bare the deep damage it inflicted on society, especially on the levels of social subjectivity, beyond its technical and professional ineptitude. Perhaps if MAS could place itself in the present and choose to look to the future instead of clinging to the tired speeches of a failed left, it would find a solution more swiftly, cheaply, and effectively—though that is unlikely given the proverbial historical myopia of today’s left. There is no doubt, however, that this crisis marks a turning point in the development of Bolivia’s economy, politics, and democracy.

Leave a comment