Minimum Agreements: Six Issues | Acuerdos mínimos: seis temas

By Andres Gomez, Vision 360:

The deterioration of public trust in democratic institutions could make people more vulnerable to demagoguery and tyranny

You, I, and our neighbors all want well-being for Bolivians. What is the path to better days? First: believing it’s possible. Second: understanding that society is a conglomerate of individuals with opposing interests, but also with common goals (One common goal: better days for Bolivia. Do you know anyone who wants worse days for Bolivia?) Third: strengthening our rational and collaborative nature. Fourth: identifying the elements of cohesion to reach the common goal.

From this perspective, I identify six issues that can bring us together as Bolivians: education, democracy, economy, environment, justice, and the fight against corruption. Making these real requires, unavoidably, a broad agreement among political forces, popular and Indigenous organizations, civil society institutions, and influential groups.

The core of this agreement must establish that no political party, no national, departmental, or local government should alter, during its mandate, the pillars of these six issues, even if it won 100% of the vote in free and transparent elections. The points are as follows:

Education. It is not a process of indoctrination. It is a process to form knowledge producers. Its goal is to expand the principles of liberal democracy. Its task is to change the future, not distort the past to control an ideologized “future.” Its aim is to sow values of coexistence and interculturality, and to turn our diversity into a source of richness for the exchange of knowledge, culture, customs, and genes.

Economy. Never a centralized economy in favor of a sector’s interests, nor state capitalism to accumulate political power. Citizens should be seen as creators of wealth and employment. We must build a society of free individuals without need, without fear, and with a future. Develop a free market aimed at empowering citizens with the ability to choose and act. No state interference in the means of production or productive forces—yes, to guaranteeing legal security for national and international investments. A less unequal society is a safer one. A citizen with formal employment has access to healthcare.

Democracy. No government should use democratic institutions to destroy democracy itself. It must be understood as a system for distributing power; therefore, it must grant citizens the power to oversee their rulers. It must be understood as a limit on power; consequently, governments must uphold a system of checks and balances. Liberal democracy is imperfect because it was created by imperfect beings, but it is also the most perfectible political system.

Environment. No government should exploit the environment without considering its finite nature. It must be understood as an essential habitat for the survival of the human species, not just as a generator of wealth. Managing natural resources based on the well-being of humanity must be understood as a rational imperative, because the actions of one or a group can affect everyone else.

Fight against corruption. No government should avoid transparency policies, which must be defined in a Law on Access to Public Information. In this sense, all public positions must be institutionalized through independent procedures to verify each official’s suitability, professionalism, and capacity. An electronic system must be created to allow citizens to monitor the use and management of public assets and resources.

Justice. No political party should nominate judges or magistrates. The selection and evaluation of candidates must be carried out by a reputable international consulting firm. The evaluation must include assessments of knowledge, judgment, and psychological profile. The use of artificial intelligence in the knowledge evaluation process must be analyzed to avoid any human bias.

Politics involves negotiation, debate, and deliberation regarding public action. This is not about declaring the end of ideologies, but about establishing minimum agreements to achieve a common goal: the well-being of our families. A government’s administration must focus on being efficient and effective in implementing these public policies. In this way, decision-making can avoid becoming ideologized, messianic, or authoritarian.

The shortcomings of democracy—which still breathes in Bolivia—can only be overcome through rational and communicative discourse that allows us to seek collective solutions to the collective problems we face right now, including the severe economic crisis afflicting the country.

The deterioration of public trust in democratic institutions could make people more vulnerable to demagoguery and tyranny. This national agreement is possible among the political forces to be elected this coming August 17. You, I, and our families all want better days for Bolivians.

Leave a comment