evo/luchin: squandered almost 90 billion dollars| dilapidaron casi 90 mil millones de dólares

Editorial, El Dia:

The left and the economy

Bolivia faces one of the worst economic crises in its recent history and the cause is only one: in less than 20 years, the governments of Evo Morales and Luis Arce Catacora squandered almost 90 billion dollars (sum of the cash flow of the General Treasury of the Nation 2006-2024), leaving the country mired in energy, social and productive ruin. This is a reflection of a broader problem: the inability of left-wing governments to efficiently manage the economy. Despite this, Luis Arce launches his campaign with the refrain that the left does know about economics.

Theories supporting socialist and leftist models tend to focus on public spending, state control, and wealth redistribution. Although these principles seek social justice, in practice they end up generating structural imbalances and financial chaos. In the Bolivian case, the model promoted by the MAS was based on state expansion, the nationalization of natural resources and excessive dependence on hydrocarbon revenues. These policies, initially sustained by the rise in international commodity prices, turned out to be unsustainable once the boom ended.

Instead of investing the extraordinary resources from the sale of gas in diversifying the economy and strengthening productive sectors, the Morales and Arce governments opted for populist measures: enormous subsidies, useless pharaonic projects and a clientelistic network that depended on state spending to hold on power.

Years of waste and mismanagement have brought us to a critical moment: the hydrocarbon industry has collapsed. Natural gas production has fallen sharply, affecting both tax revenues and exports.

The Bolivian situation is not an isolated case. The economic disasters generated by leftist regimes have been repeated again and again in recent history. What are the common mistakes that lead to failure?

1.- Excess public spending: The obsession with financing social programs without considering fiscal sustainability generates chronic deficits and debt. 2.- Excessive state control: The nationalization of industries and natural resources promotes inefficiency and corruption. 3.- Economic populism: Prioritizing short-term measures to gain popular support sacrifices long-term economic stability. 4.- Control of prices and markets: These measures cause shortages, inflation and a drop in productivity. 5.- Dependence on natural resources: The lack of economic diversification leaves countries vulnerable to fluctuations in international prices. 6.- Disincentive to private investment: High taxes and excessive regulations drive away investors, which limits economic growth. 7.- Structural corruption: Left-wing governments tend to expand the state apparatus, creating spaces for corruption and clientelism.

Luis Arce Catacora persists in defending his economic model, which demonstrates a disconnection with the economic reality of the country. Instead of acknowledging mistakes and seeking sustainable solutions, the government seems hell-bent on perpetuating the same policies that have brought us to the brink of collapse.

Leave a comment