The imputation to a democracy hero | La imputación a un héroe de la democracia

Editorial, El Deber:

Systems engineer Édgar Villegas has been charged with public instigation to commit crimes. Such a serious accusation comes from a deputy, Renán Cabezas, from the Evista bloc of the Movement Towards Socialism (MAS), who also demands that the professional be detained in the maximum-security prison of Chonchocoro. More than four years after that moment, the assemblyman and the accusing prosecutor believe that the collective memory of Bolivians has forgotten the countless irregularities committed in that electoral process. Precisely because none of that is forgotten, the reactions of indignation continue to accumulate.

Engineer Édgar Villegas did meticulous work and demonstrated that there were significant differences between the results of the TREP system (rapid transmission of electoral data) and the official count of the Electoral Body: the photographed TREP records showed a number of votes for each party, but in the electoral system, those figures were altered, adding to Evo Morales’ MAS and reducing Carlos Mesa’s Citizen Community. That was one of Villegas’ conclusions, along with a team of young professionals who took the trouble to analyze and present it to the public.

It was not the only evidence of electoral manipulation or fraud. Earlier, on the same day as the elections, in Potosí, it was discovered that many boxes of electoral material were being stored in a location that was not the Departmental Electoral Tribunal, while several reports indicated that several records had not reached their destination. Additionally, the vote count had been halted for over 12 hours, and then a sudden shift declared Evo Morales as the winner, which was practically impossible given the data trend.

Later on, Ethical Hacking, a company hired by the Supreme Electoral Tribunal to audit the elections, revealed the irregularities and intrusion into the TREP and electoral system, indicating clear computer manipulation, for which the administrator of that system, who has now fled the country, was accused.

The aforementioned would later be corroborated by an audit conducted by experts from the Organization of American States, who were summoned by none other than Evo Morales himself. Upon learning the results of this thorough review, Morales announced that he would call for new elections with new electoral officials, thereby making it clear that those responsible for conducting the elections had not been honest or, at least, giving credence to citizens’ suspicions.

The country erupted the day after the results were announced, declaring Evo Morales as the winner amid so many irregularities. When Villegas revealed his findings on a television program, street clashes were already occurring because the public was outraged by the deception that was being attempted.

This is the context, which is why it is now an aberration to accuse Villegas of inciting public crime. In a context of turmoil like the one Bolivia was experiencing, this systems engineer stood up for Bolivia and transparency. He did nothing but set aside passivity and analyze what was happening in the electoral system and the rapid data transmission mechanism (TREP). Villegas was a hero of democracy, along with all those who dared to expose the irregularities that were committed.

It’s important to remember that the OAS audit report, later endorsed by the European Union, exposed that the electoral system was penetrated by external servers that could modify the results; that there were repeated signatures on records that were in different places; that there was data manipulation, among many more process anomalies.

Citizen fury manifested in a 21-day national strike that was observed by Bolivians across the country. Evo Morales resigned from power along with his vice president and the heads of the Legislative Chambers because the citizen strike did not relent. These are real and concrete events that political persecution will not erase.

Leave a comment