Who is really Luis Arce? | ¿Quién es realmente Luis Arce?

By Puka Reyesvilla, Brujula Digital:

Manual of the Perfect Tilín

Originally, the nickname “Tilín” was given with an obvious derogatory connotation. The precedent is a short video of a boy whom a voice (the face of whom is not seen) encourages, increasingly enthusiastically, to perform a series of antics. It is clear that it refers to the docility of a person who not only obeys but also “dances” to the rhythm and sound of a third party pushing him to do so.

At first, evidently, our plurinational Tilín acted in such a role. I say “acted” because, seen from here and now, it seems that the man either played dumb (his appearance greatly aids in this) for some time before making a big move—emancipating himself, let’s say—or his environment led him to it.

Delving even more finely, it could be ventured that he was always, in an attitude of pretending to be naive, seeking to reach where he is today. Even the voice supposedly controlling him—I doubt now if it was authentically true; such extreme obedience even becomes suspicious—pushed him for candidacy above the “natural” replacement whom, the big boss must have thought, he couldn’t control.

The Tilín option arose from a more sophisticated plan: as “the voice,” unable to run for the presidency, had the alternative of running for a senate seat and, from there, causing resignations until, as president of the upper chamber—as it was aimed at—assuming, by constitutional succession, the presidency. The plan, as we know, did not succeed, and Tilín achieved his goal, tasted—the sweetness of power he had partially tasted for several years—and, along with his courtiers, decided to act as the “wise guy” that we now know he is.

Resignified in his figure, from derogatory, the nickname has transformed into quite a compliment that refers to a way of being: to the aforementioned “wise guy,” that is, to someone who appears to lack character, seems a bit absent-minded, a little foolish, but who, without great brilliance either, turns out to be quite a character.

Some talent must be required for this, so I dare to enumerate some “qualities” for such a personality. I found a sort of synthetic characterization out there: “Being foolish is an art, but being secretly cunning is a masterpiece.” Take it as a compliment, my good Tilín. Here we go:

  1. “It wasn’t me, it was Teté.” Everything goes wrong, but nothing is your responsibility. The blame is always on others (the empire, the right-wing, Emo…).
  2. Pretending to be naive. When asked about something specific and you answer about the origin of whipped cream.
  3. Going round and round… until you finally admit: “There’s no spare change.” You hope that, just as they criticized your denialism (acting foolish), they will praise you for your frankness (brave, sincere, macho).
  4. The “surprise” factor. Putting on a lost-in-space face while scheming tricks that will leave the opponent offside when the time comes.
  5. Capitalizing on your rivals’ interests in your favor. It just happened by putting the governors (largely opposition) against the Legislative Assembly to force the approval of more credits.
  6. Making up tall tales. For example, the famous “economy’s shield,” the success of industrialization, claiming the discovery of coffee with milk, etc.

Of course, there are many more characteristics, but I’ll stop here. It’s up to the ingenuity of each reader to add as many as the “Tilín” style allows.

Leave a comment