Editorial, El Dia:

The people of Santa Cruz can be accused of many things, but not of being a dormant society. Santa Cruz is restless, entrepreneurial, contradictory, and difficult to tame. That vitality can be irritating to some. Hence the recurring criticisms: not cultured enough, too regionalist, excessively proud of its symbols, and above all, intolerant.

Those who speak of a lack of culture are often the same people who can recite Marx by heart or repeat old dependency theories—formulas from another century that supposedly explain Bolivia’s poverty—while Santa Cruz, allegedly ignorant, continues to be the country’s economic engine and the main hub attracting investment, business, and people willing to work.

There is, however, a form of intolerance that deserves to be understood before it is condemned. Santa Cruz is an open and integrated society, built on migration and commerce, on people who arrived from everywhere in search of a better life. Yet that openness has never meant a willingness to surrender everything to those who arrive intending to impose a different way of life.

Santa Cruz often confounds those who interpret it through imported theories. The people of Santa Cruz fiercely defend their flags, traditions, music, and celebrations—something certain intellectuals interpret as provincialism. To some globalist-minded observers, strongly defending one’s own heritage can seem primitive.

But it is worth considering what has happened to societies that believed themselves to be excessively tolerant. Europe, the birthplace of much of humanity’s civilizational legacy, was once swept away by ideologies that led to tragedies now studied as warnings. Having overcome that chapter of its history, it now faces new challenges related to identity and social cohesion. Unlimited openness can weaken precisely what it seeks to protect. The lesson is not to stop being open, but not to confuse openness with abandoning one’s own identity.

The people of Santa Cruz never embraced the MAS, the destructive political project that dominated Bolivia for two decades. While MAS entrenched itself across much of the country, it encountered persistent resistance here. Santa Cruz has always been wary of centralism, statism, and the concentration of power—elements that the MAS movement pushed to extremes.

A society that debates, protests, and defends its own interests may appear contentious. Yet it possesses something that others have lost: the ability to react. The relevant question is not why the people of Santa Cruz are intolerant, but what happens when a society ceases to be intolerant of everything—when it no longer distinguishes between coexistence and submission, between openness and surrender, between tolerance and resignation.

That vigilant attitude, which some interpret as narrow-mindedness, is what has allowed Santa Cruz to survive, grow, and distinguish itself, even at the cost of enduring criticism from those who prefer to follow the current. Being labeled intolerant for refusing to surrender easily is not a flaw; it is the price of not becoming a docile people, easily shaped by the will of others.

Santa Cruz can be hospitable without being naïve. Open without losing its identity. And it can welcome the world without allowing the world to take away what made it Santa Cruz.

Leave a comment

Visit us using the links above / visitenos usando los enlaces de arriba:

Facebook: more content in Spanish / más contenido en español.

We are also in / También estamos en: Instagram, X