They dynamite the system when it stops serving them | Dinamitan el sistema cuando este deja de servirles

Editorial El Día:

The “Fearsome” Null Vote

In Bolivia, the null vote has historically been a form of protest—a sign of distrust, exclusion, or political fatigue. However, in the volatile run-up to the August 17 elections, its intentional and strategic use by Evo Morales’ faction raises an unsettling question: are we witnessing a legitimate expression of dissent, or a deliberate attempt to distort the results and delegitimize the electoral process?

Since the return to democracy in 1982, null vote patterns have mirrored the country’s political pulse. Except for 2016 and 2019—when they reached 9% and 12.3% respectively—null votes have remained consistently low. In fact, the historical average across nine presidential elections and one referendum doesn’t even reach 6%.

Are we facing an exceptional case, driven by Morales’ political resentment? It’s telling that the two highest spikes in null voting were acts of rejection aimed precisely at him. And it’s not far-fetched to think that much of the indecision reflected in today’s polls stems from deep disapproval of the former president and anything associated with him.

The 12.3% of null and blank votes registered in 2019 didn’t change the official outcome, but they did trigger an institutional crisis that ended with Morales’ resignation. That episode confirmed that null votes don’t decide winners—but they do reveal fractures: when they rise, it signals a breakdown between citizens and the political system.

This time, however, the phenomenon is unprecedented. It’s not the opposition, civic movements, or independents pushing for null votes—it’s Morales’ own faction, marginalized after their leader’s disqualification, that’s driving the strategy. For the first time, a wing of the ruling party seeks to destabilize from within—not through proposals or candidates, but by attempting to strip the electoral process of legitimacy.

The aim isn’t to build an alternative—it’s to blow up the system when it no longer serves their interests. In this way, the null vote ceases to be a spontaneous citizen response and becomes a tool of political sabotage. Technically, null votes aren’t counted in the final tally; however, in a scenario with a high proportion of them, the percentages of valid candidates rise artificially. This can facilitate a first-round victory or ensure greater representation in the Legislative Assembly. In other words, while null votes don’t elect, they do shift the balance of the electoral game.

As a strategy, null voting by Morales’ faction is meant to pave the way for a future narrative of illegitimacy. Are there conditions for this tactic to distort the political course of August 17? In theory, yes—and that’s precisely what Morales is aiming for. He still clings to the fantasy of unconditional popular support, as he tried to prove in the February 21, 2016 referendum—only to be defeated. This time, he’s taking a legitimate protest tool—historically citizen-led—and twisting it in a desperate attempt to preserve his political relevance. If he succeeds, it will be nothing short of a miracle.

Leave a comment