146 years since the treacherous Chilean invasion of Antofagasta/Bolivia | 146 años de la artera invasión chilena a Antofagasta/Bolivia

By El Diario:

Today marks 146 years since the Chilean invasion of Antofagasta

On February 14, 1879, a significant event in Bolivian history occurred when the Chilean invasion of the port of Antofagasta was announced, marking the beginning of the War of the Pacific. 146 years have passed since that tragic episode, which deprived Bolivia of a maritime access.

According to historian and researcher Víctor Hugo Chávez Serrano, it all began on the morning of February 14, 1879, when the Chilean warships “Cochrane” and “O’Higgins” were sighted in the bay of the port of Antofagasta, along with the “Blanco Encalada,” which had been anchored there for a few days.

The ships opened fire, managing to scare the population, who were taken by surprise by the artillery attack, but it was just the start of the assault that would shape the history of the Americas. He pointed out that, in the absence of defense by the Bolivians in the area, Chile proceeded to take over Mejillones, Tocopilla, and Cobija. “The civil response began on March 23, 1879, with our hero of Topater, Eduardo Abaroa, entering history.”

====

Editorial, Los Tiempos:

146 years of the invasion of Antofagasta

On February 14, 1879, 146 years ago, the most tragic and painful chapter of Bolivia’s history began, a chapter that remains open, just as the wounds left by the loss of our maritime access are still open.

During the early hours of that day, two warships — the “Cochrane” and the “O’Higgins” — anchored in the port of Antofagasta, joining the “Blanco Encalada,” another armored ship that had already been stationed there. The invading forces disembarked and took control of the city without encountering any resistance, marking the beginning of the most significant territorial loss suffered by our country. It wasn’t just the access to the sea that was taken from us, but also a territory that, although desert, contained vast mineral riches. Riches that remain the main pillar of the Chilean economy today.

It is enough to see that nearly 60% of Chile’s exports come from the territory that was once Bolivia’s, and which now constitutes Chile’s second region. Copper alone accounted for 50.8% of the country’s exports in 2024.

The loss of these territories and the status of being a coastal nation has undeniably caused an incalculable detriment to the national economy. To that dimension of damage must be added the traumatic effects it had and still has on the national soul and conscience. A trauma that continues to disrupt the collective mindset and condemns us to make victimhood a central aspect of our identity.

This largely explains why the cause of maritime reclamation has been, for the past 146 years, a unifying force for the thoughts and wills of Bolivians. It is the only cause around which other points of disagreement are secondary, granting those who champion it valuable and effective political capital. It is, therefore, a tool that can easily be misused, and worse, abused.

The damage caused by the usurpation we commemorate today thus has a dual dimension: the objective one, primarily reflected in economic harm, and the subjective one, whose manifestations range from poisoning the soul of our children and young people from the most basic levels of their education to the ease with which the issue is open to manipulation.

Regarding the first aspect, experience teaches us that the best approach is a healthy realism that allows the solution to our demand to also be seen in Chile as the beginning of a fruitful relationship between both peoples.

As for its subjective, cultural, and political dimension, it is most advisable to avoid allowing the maritime cause to become a tool for political manipulation.

Leave a comment